i

Environmental Law Journal becomes part of Scielo Chile

The publication edited by the Environmental Law Center will be part of an open access collection of Chilean scientific journals in all areas of knowledge.

The Environmental Law Journal, edited by the Environmental Law Center of the Law School of the University of Chile, was admitted to be part of the SciELO - Chile Scientific Electronic Library.

SciELO - Chile is an open access collection of texts from Chilean scientific journals, from all areas of knowledge, which predominantly publish articles resulting from scientific research, and which uses peer review of the manuscripts they receive, which show a growing performance in the indicators of compliance with the indexing criteria.

"We are very pleased with this recognition, which is the result of an effort of continuous improvement of the editorial processes developed by the editorial team, which has resulted in the growing increase in the quality of the articles published over the years," said the director of the Journal, Prof. Valentina Durán Medina, adding "we are grateful for the support of the Faculty, which through its Dean, Prof. Pablo Ruiz-Tagle, and the Journals Program of the Research Department, headed by Prof. Daniel Álvarez, has provided permanent support to the work of the journal."

"Once the collaboration agreement between the Faculty of Law of the University of Chile and the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID) is signed, the full incorporation of the journal to this collection will take place, starting in 2022" explained the editor Jorge Ossandón Rosales.

This good news is in addition to the admission, in 2020, of the Environmental Law Journal to the SCOPUS database.

As a result, in 2022 the Environmental Law Journal will already be indexed in Scopus, Redib, DOAJ and Latindex, in addition to ScIELO, with the support of SISIB and the Journals Program of the Research Department of the Law School of the Universidad of Chile.

It should be noted that Issue 16 of this biannual journal will be published on December 31.

 

Nearly ten years after the regulation of the expiry of Environmental Permits: ten legal-practical dilemmas in its application

Authors

Abstract

This article studies the expiry and accreditation of Environmental Permits. It provides a review of the expiry of Environmental Permits, its normative consecration and its implementation by the Environmental Assessment Agency and the Superintendency of the Environment. Then, it raises ten legal-practical dilemmas around the expiry and accreditation of Environmental Permits. In particular, it examines questions of legality, legal certainty, means for contesting and administrative coordination. It highlights the lack of regulation under which projects remain once their implementation has been accredited; the absence of mechanisms that effectively force their continuity; and external situations that may affect their continuity. In this context, the work intends to approach the question of whether in the first ten years of application of the expiry of Environmental Permits, the aim that the legislator had in mind when including article 25 ter in Law No. 19300 is fulfilled: that projects are executed under similar baseline conditions to those considered in the environmental impact assessment procedure. This, it is argued, has not been sufficiently achieved. A series of regulatory adjustments are necessary, which are outlined throughout the study.

Keywords:

Expiry, Project implementation, Environmental permit, Superintendency of the Environment, Environmental Assessment Agency

Author Biographies

Teresita Chubretovic Arnaiz, Investigador Independiente

Teresita Chubretovic Arnaiz is a lawyer from the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and MSc Environment, Culture and Society, University of Edinburgh.

Gustavo Arellano Reyes, Investigador Independiente

Gustavo Arellano Reyes is a lawyer from Universidad de Chile.

References

Bermúdez Soto, Jorge (2005). «El principio de la confianza legítima en la actuación de la administración como límite a la potestad invalidatoria». Revista de Derecho (Universidad Austral de Chile), 18 (2): 83-105.

Bermúdez Soto, Jorge (2013). Fundamentos de Derecho Ambiental. 2.a Edición. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.

Bermúdez Soto, Jorge (2014). Derecho Administrativo General. Santiago: Legal Publishing Chile.

BCN, Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile (2010). Historia de la Ley 20.417: crea el Ministerio, el Servicio de Evaluación Ambiental y la Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente.

Comisión Asesora Presidencial para la Evaluación del SEIA (2016). Informe Final. Santiago: Ministerio del Medio Ambiente.

Comisión de Pesca, Acuicultura e Intereses Marítimos, Cámara de Diputados, Congreso de Chile (2021). Informe de la Comisión de Pesca, Acuicultura e Intereses Marítimos, recaído en el Proyecto de Ley que amplía el procedimiento de relocalización a concesiones de acuicultura que indica y establece permisos especiales de colecta de semillas. Boletín número 11317-21. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3FwUgYt.

Cordero Vega, Luis (2015). Lecciones de Derecho Administrativo. 2.a Edición. Santiago: Thomson Reuters.

Flores Rivas, Juan Carlos (2017). «La caducidad de los actos administrativos». Revista de Derecho (Universidad Austral de Chile), 30 (2): 225-249.

Herrera Valverde, Javier y Samuel Ruiz-Tagle Gutiérrez (2014). «La caducidad de la Resolución de Calificación Ambiental». Revista de Derecho (Universidad Austral de Chile), 27 (1): 169-190.

Mardones Osorio, Marcelo y Nicolás Cannoni Mandujano (2016). «Caducidad de las Resoluciones de Calificación Ambiental y RSEIA». Revista Chilena de Derecho, 43 (2): 573-600.

SMA, Superintendencia del Medio Ambiente (2022). Cuenta Pública Participativa 2021-2022. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3hCq6uH.